Afghan Army to go from 85,000 to about 270,000
The WP reports
McChrystal has not yet completed a 60-day assessment of the war due next month. But Defense Department officials in Washington and in Kabul said he has informed Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, including in a status update this week, of the need to increase the Afghan force substantially. Officials spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss findings that have not yet been made public.
The Afghan army is already scheduled to grow from 85,000 to 134,000, an expansion originally expected to take five years but now fast-tracked for completion by 2011. Several senior Pentagon officials indicated that an adequate size for the Afghan force might be twice the expanded number. ...
But Jones and others acknowledged that both reconstruction and competent governance cannot be achieved until the Afghan people are secure. The strategy calls for U.S. and Afghan forces to clear areas of the Taliban and then hold them. Commanders leading a Marine operation launched last week to drive Taliban forces from Helmand Province in southern Afghanistan are already asking, "Where are the Afghan troops? Where's the economic plan? Where is the government?" Jones said....
Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen told reporters Wednesday that the White House and the Pentagon are "committed to properly resourcing this endeavor."
A 270,000 army isn't large for a 32 mil. population country with a security problem. European countries can put about that many military personnel in the field for the same population, and that is after decades of peace. For instance, Poland has a bit over 100,000 active duty military personnel, up to 340,000 once reserves are called up, with a population of 38 million. Germany with a population of 82 million has fully mobilized military personnel of around 600,000, again the same magnitude. Both not high military intensity societies.
Somewhat surprising/shocking that it took so long to build up force levels in Afghanistan given the conflict, especially since it does not seem to reflect a deliberate choice to build up forces slowly and financing Afghan personnel ought to be relatively cheap.
I know, lots of second order problems here. I'd not be surprised if we end up with force levels at 500,000 or more in 2016. This would not at all be out of line with historical experience for peasant societies in conflict situations. Hell, Serbia, very much a peasant society with a population under 5 million, could put 500,000 men in the field at the start of WWI.
