Andrew Samwick writes:
The problem is that one cannot easily
build Charleston anymore, because it is against the law. Similarly,
Boston's Beacon Hill, Nantucket, Santa Fe, Carmel -- all of these
well-known places, many of which have become tourist destinations,
exist in direct violation of current zoning ordinances. Even the
classic American main street, with its mixed-use buildings right up
against the sidewalk, is now illegal in most municipalities. Somewhere
along the way, through a series of small and well-intentioned steps,
traditional towns became a crime in America. At the same time, one of
the largest segments of the economy, the homebuilding industry,
developed a comprehensive system of land development practices based on
sprawl, practices that have become so ingrained as to be second
nature. It is these practices, and the laws that encourage them, which
must be overcome if good growth is to become a viable alternative.
It would be nice to know more:first, are the claims above actually true? If yes, how did this situation arise? Why did it arise? What perpetuates it? What would optimal zoning and building codes look like? How could we get there, realistically speaking?